Quite a racket!
![]() |
Figure 1: The spectrum of a SolarEdge PV system from several meters away across the 6-8 MHz range showing spurs at 200 kHz and other places. Click on the image for a larger version. |
In driving around with an HF mobile station in my vehicle, I can hear these 200 kHz carriers almost everywhere around town during daylight hours - the roar getting much stronger in/near residential areas as you would expect. If driving through a residential neighborhood, it is very easy to tell when you drive past a house equipped with a SolarEdge PV system - and it is easily audible from a block or two away.
Are they DX? 1
A question arose in my mind: Does this "grunge" produced by the SolarEdge PV systems propagate long distances?
To answer this question I checked a KiwiSDR at the Northern Utah WebSDR. This receive system is located about 3 miles (5km) from any residential area, bounded on three sides with mosquito-laden bird refuges (wetlands) and on the fourth side by a mountain.
The quick answer to the above question is YES - the roar of SolarEdge systems is propagated when conditions are "reasonable" 2 as shown in the screen capture below:
The "hump" in the highlighted analyzer plot in the top portion of the image - and the "band" of noise between 14.199 and 14.200 MHz are the sum of the propagated low-level carriers from... who knows where? To be clear, this energy is not likely to be from just one SolarEdge PV system and its individual optimizers (one for each panel) but more likely from the many thousands of such devices that are each, individually radiating energy. What we are seeing is the total energy of the propagated systems, the frequency spread being centered around 14.1993 MHz in a semi-Gaussian distribution.
It's worth noting that the fact that these signals do not land on exactly the same frequency - hence the Gaussian-like distribution of energy - and this has interesting implications. Even though the signal from each, individual optimizer is (more or less) a CW (unmodulated) carrier, the fact that there are so many of them clustered together means that for statistical purposes, they might as well be a distribution of noise energy: Unlike a single coherent CW signal, the DSP filtering on modern radios will do little/nothing to reduce their effects if they were to cause interference.
A quick analysis of the signal above showed that if the signal above were a single, coherent CW signal, the total amount of energy contained in the "hump" in Figure 2 would have easily been 15-20dB above the noise in a 50 Hz detection bandwidth: A CW signal of this strength would certainly be cause for complaints!
I also looked at around 14.000 and 14.400 the same, exact types of signals were present on those frequencies - and similar bunches of energy were noted as low as 10.200 and around 18.200 MHz as well - this range being related to current ionospheric propagation at the moment that I checked (e.g. around 1845 on September 10 UTC, 2025).
To verify that these signals were propagated and were likely from SolarEdge systems, several things were done:
- The presence at many 200 kHz multiples/intervals across the HF spectrum is telling!
- On days with poor propagation overall, these signals were absent - or limited to frequencies commensurate to the MUF (Maximum Useable Frequency).
- These signals disappear at night. (This test is somewhat complicated by the fact that propagation on these bands also changes at night - but sunlight is still illuminating the ionosphere well after sunset on the ground.)
- An "S-meter" plot was run over the period of several minutes: A propagated signal would show variations in signal strength - but this can be foiled to a degree by the fact that many, many individual point sources would each be propagated differently and unlike a single source, would not experience as deep a fading as the plot below shows:
As noted in the original article (linked above) the SolarEdge optimizers produce another signal 6-10 dB weaker at various points above each 200 kHz interval - these are visible in Figure 1. When the above plots were made, these signals weren't readily apparent - but I suspect that they will be visible during "excellent" propagation conditions rather than the "mediocre-to-average" conditions that were present when Figures 2 and 3 were produced.
Conclusion:
So yes, you can DX SolarEdge PV systems - it's just that there are so many of them each doing their own radiating that you probably won't know from where those signals originate, so it's hard to know from how far away you might actually be hearing them!
Do these signals actually cause QRM 3? As noted in the earlier post (liked above) they most certainly do if you live within a city block or two of one of the SolarEdge PV systems and operate on or near any of the frequencies occupied by the spurious radiation represented in Figure 1. If your receive system is located well away from a SolarEdge installation, the above shows that you may still experience interference from these systems - albeit from a significant distance.away.
Figure 2 also shows that the emissions do propagate - likely over long distances: The 20 meter band's optimal "skip" distance would likely place the majority of these signals in a 700-1500 mile (1100-2400 km) radius of Northern Utah - and this includes quite a few populated areas in parts of the U.S. where the number of solar installations is quite high.
If you live in a quiet location and have a receiver with a waterfall display you might want to check the various amateur bands
Footnotes:
- The term "DX" means distance. Generally speaking, if a signal is "DX" it is understood that it must be being propagated over much more than a line-of-sight distance - in this case, via ionospheric propagation at distances of hundreds or thousands of miles/km.
- The frequencies mentioned have been checked when ionospheric propagation is poor (comparatively few strong signals) and the characteristic SolarEdge carriers were absent. This further illustrates the fact that the signals described above are not local to the remote receive site and reinforces the likelihood that they are, in fact, being propagated.
- "QRM" is a "Q" signal referring to "Man Made Interference" and the magnitude of this interference in comparison to the desired signals determines if this is harmful interference. If QRM makes it difficult/impossible to receive a signal on frequency, that would fit the definition of harmful interference.
* * * * *
This page stolen from ka7oei.blogspot.com
[END]
No comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE NOTE:
While I DO appreciate comments, those comments that are just vehicles to other web sites without substantial content in their own right WILL NOT be posted!
If you include a link in your comment that simply points to advertisements or a commercial web page, it WILL be rejected as SPAM!