This becomes problematic if one is using an antenna with a relatively flat gain across the entire HF spectrum - and one wishes to make the receiver usable at both the top and bottom ends of this range. As an example, I have a KiwiSDR connected to an antenna that is rated to cover from 3 to 30 MHz with roughly constant gain, but I noted that at the top end of the frequency range, around the 10 meter amateur band, the overall system gain was not quite sufficient to "hear" the background iononspheric noise.
The obvious solution to this gain deficit is to install an RF amplifier - which I did - but this had the effect of increasing the already-strong signals below 5-10 MHz even more, resulting in occasional "OV" indications on the KiwiSDR's S-meter signalling to me that the RF levels were high enough to "clip" the A/D converter. While this wasn't too much of a problem during normal conditions, if the lower HF band were particularly noisy - as often occurs in the summer with thunderstorms on the same continent - reception across the entire HF spectrum was compromised when the loud static crashes would occasionally saturate the A/D converter.
It occurred to me that while I had about the right amount of system gain on 10 meters, I had far more than I needed at lower frequencies and could throw some of it away, so I set about designing a filter that would reduce signals at the low end of the HF spectrum, but have minimal effect at the upper end.
A "limited" high-pass filter:
The obvious solution to this would be the addition of a high-pass filter - but there's a problem: Even a minimal high-pass filter would have increasingly-higher attenuation at lower and lower frequencies - potentially in the many 10s of dB - but we don't really want to get rid of the lowest frequencies. What we need is a filter that will "knock down" signals by a significant amount - but not so much that they become inaudible.
In analyzing the signal levels, I determined that the goal of the design would be to leave signal levels above about 10 MHz unaffected, but reduce the signals below 8 MHz or so by 10-15dB. This amount of attenuation (about 2 "S" units) would significantly reduce the amount of RF energy entering the A/D converter at these frequency (about 2 "bits" worth) but analysis of the noise floor and signal levels at these lower frequencies indicated that I would still be able to hear the noise floor.
The diagram of this filter is shown below:
As tested on a spectrum analyzer, the insertion loss is 12-13dB from DC to about 4 MHz at which point it gradually drops to about 2dB at 11 MHz and then dropping to less than 1dB by 30 MHz. When doing an "A/B" comparison with and without the filter on the KiwiSDR, the waterfall above 10 MHz looked unchanged by the signal below about 7 MHz were much less "bright" - and most importantly, the occasional "OV" indications on the S-meter pretty much stopped appearing altogether.
In my opinion, the RF input on the KiwiSDR is slightly deaf, requiring a bit of gain (say, 6-10dB) to be able to reliably hear the background ionospheric noise on the higher HF bands - particularly when they are closed - a problem compounded by normal amplitude roll-off as one nears the Nyquist frequency. To this end, the KiwiSDR at this location is preceded by a low-noise, high dynamic range RF amplifier that is flat from a few 10s of kHz to well over 30 MHz.
The components for construction of this filter aren't critical: The capacitors are high-stability NP0 (a.k.a. C0G) ceramic types while L1-L3 are wound using 30 AWG enameled wire with L1 and L2 having 15 turns and L3 having 12 turns on T37-2 toroidal cores, respectively. L4 is a an inexpensive molded inductor and its value can be anything from 2.2 to 3.3 uH, or one could make it by winding 25 turns on the same type of T37-2 toroidal cores as used for L1-L3.
A look at the Kiwi's waterfall with the filter:
Figure 3, below, shows this filter in place on the KiwiSDR at the Northern Utah WebSDR site:
If I build another of these filters I'll push the "knee" up 1-2 MHz higher, starting the roll-off of signals below 11-12 MHz, instead.
This filter seems to be very effective in reducing the total signal power from lower HF frequencies while having minimal effect at higher frequencies. Because the signal+noise levels from a broadband antenna are much higher at the lower end of the spectrum, it is possible to reduce these signals by 2 "S" units or so without dropping the background noise - or the signals themselves - below the noise floor of the receiver.
For information on a filter system that is specifically designed to attenuate AM (MW) broadcast band signals, see the article "Managing HF signal dynamics on the RTL-SDR (and KiwiSDR) receivers", also on this blog.
This page stolen from ka7oei.blogspot.com